ElementNode
Performance

WordPress, 10 seconds behind.

Same server. Same page. Element Node loads faster and handles more traffic — because there’s no PHP, there are RSC.

Same hardware. Same page.

WordPress 6 + Elementor PRO vs Element Node. Misurato su Plesk shared, 1 vCPU 2GB.

WP + Elementor Element Node
TTFBlower is better
1,240 ms
95 ms
Largest Contentful Paintlower is better
3,800 ms
1,100 ms
Total Blocking Timelower is better
620 ms
35 ms
Lighthouse Performancehigher is better
52 /100
97 /100
Bundle initial JSlower is better
720 kB
88 kB

Benchmark interno · pagina identica (hero + 3 sezioni + form) · medie su 20 esecuzioni · cache fredda al primo load.

Five reasons WordPress can’t catch up

Not really our credit. It’s Next.js + Prisma + RSC + a clean design.

No PHP request/response

Node.js serves with an event loop, not a PHP process per request.

React Server Components

Only interactive components ship JS to the browser. The rest is pre-rendered HTML.

Prisma + connection pooling

Prepared MySQL queries, managed pool, no plugin opening new connections.

Image optimization via sharp

Automatic WebP/AVIF, responsive sizes, native lazy.

HTTP cache + ISR

Published pages stay cached until the next deploy or invalidation.

No mandatory plugins

Every WordPress plugin is 50–500 KB more JS. Element Node starts at zero.

Benchmark methodology

Numbers aren’t made up. Here is how we measured.

  • Plesk shared VPS, 1 vCPU 2GB RAM, Italy region
  • Same content page: hero + 3 sections + contact form
  • WordPress 6.x + Elementor PRO + cache plugin (WP Rocket)
  • Element Node 1.x with `output: standalone` and nginx in front
  • 20 runs via Lighthouse CLI, mean reported
  • Cold cache on first load, warm on second

Ready to leave WordPress?

Try it in the live demo, or download the CMS and put it on your server in 10 minutes.